A Venmo spokesperson once described their platform as “not a bank.” In 2024, the federal government essentially replied: we don’t care what you call yourself.
What Is Actually Going On
Picture a Saturday morning. You split brunch with friends on Venmo, pay your electricity bill through your bank’s app, and tap your phone at a coffee shop. Three transactions. Three different companies. Until 2024, federal examiners had real authority over exactly one of them.
That changed. The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau finalized its rule designating large nonbank payment platforms as subject to federal supervision — the same kind of oversight your local bank has endured for decades. Companies processing over 50 million consumer transactions per year now sit inside the CFPB’s examination tent.
Simultaneously, the FTC sharpened its attack on junk fees across the payments ecosystem. Surprise charges, buried disclosures, fees that appear only at the final checkout screen — the FTC spent 2024 signaling it considers these practices unfair and deceptive, full stop.
Why It Is Happening Right Now
The short answer: the money moved, and the rules didn’t. Digital payment volumes in the U.S. crossed $10 trillion in annual transactions by 2023, with a staggering 82% of Americans using at least one nonbank payment app regularly. The regulatory framework, meanwhile, was built for a world where your money lived at a bank on Main Street.
The CFPB under Director Rohit Chopra made a deliberate institutional bet that nonbank tech giants were operating as shadow banks — taking deposits, moving money, storing financial data — without the accountability that comes with a bank charter. The open banking rule, formally called the Personal Financial Data Rights rule, added a third dimension. It forced financial institutions to give consumers portable access to their own data.
These three moves — platform supervision, junk fee enforcement, and data portability — weren’t accidental. They formed a coordinated attempt to redesign the consumer payments landscape before a potential change in regulatory appetite. Which, of course, arrived anyway.
What This Means for You Personally
Your payment apps are now theoretically accountable to federal examiners in a way they weren’t before. That means the company holding your $800 in a Cash App balance can be audited for how it handles disputes, errors, and fraud complaints. The CFPB’s existing protections around electronic funds transfers now apply more clearly to your digital wallet.
The junk fee crackdown means companies face real pressure to disclose costs upfront. You’re less likely to hit an unexpected $3.50 fee at the confirmation screen — or at least, companies face legal exposure if you do. Whether that exposure actually changes behavior depends heavily on enforcement, which is where 2026 gets complicated.
The open banking rule is the sleeper here. You can now formally request your bank transfer your transaction history, account data, and balance information to a competitor or financial tool of your choosing. It’s your data. They have to give it up.
What the Experts Are Actually Saying
Consumer advocates celebrated the platform supervision rule while financial industry lawyers immediately started drafting challenges. The tension is real and ongoing.
“The CFPB’s move on payment apps was long overdue. Consumers had no idea that the protections covering their bank account simply didn’t apply when they stored money in an app. That’s a gap that cost real people real money.” — Chi Chi Wu, National Consumer Law Center
Industry groups argued the rules create compliance burdens that will ultimately push smaller fintech companies out of the market, leaving consumers with fewer options and bigger players. That’s not a frivolous concern. Compliance infrastructure costs money that startups often don’t have.
What Happens Next
Here’s the honest read from 2026: the rules exist, but their enforcement life is uncertain. The CFPB faced significant budget and authority challenges after the 2024 election cycle. Several large payment platforms filed legal challenges to the supervisory designation rule, and at least one case has moved toward appellate review.
The FTC’s junk fee push has fared slightly better, partly because it aligns with bipartisan consumer irritation — nobody likes surprise fees, regardless of party. Some states picked up the enforcement slack where federal appetite softened.
Open banking may prove the most durable. The financial data portability rule has genuine industry support from the fintech sector, which stands to gain from easier customer acquisition. When part of the industry wants a rule to survive, it tends to survive.
The payments industry in 2024 learned something uncomfortable: acting like a bank while insisting you’re not one only works until someone in Washington decides to stop believing you. Whether that lesson holds through the next regulatory cycle is the question that’s still being answered.
—
Have you ever lost money in a payment app dispute, or tried to use your financial data rights? Tell us what happened in the comments — or share this with someone still storing rent money in Venmo.
Frequently Asked Questions
Did the CFPB actually gain power over payment apps in 2024?
Yes. The CFPB finalized a rule extending its supervisory reach to large nonbank payment platforms processing over 50 million transactions annually. That pulled companies like Apple Pay, Venmo, and Cash App under federal examination authority for the first time.
What are junk fees, and why does the FTC care about them in payments?
Junk fees are hidden or unavoidable charges tacked onto transactions—think surprise ATM surcharges or undisclosed currency conversion costs. The FTC's 2024 push targeted deceptive fee disclosure practices across payment processors and financial apps.
How does the open banking rule affect regular consumers?
The CFPB's Personal Financial Data Rights rule means you can now demand your bank hand your financial data to a third-party service you trust. It shifts control from institutions to individuals, theoretically making it easier to switch banks or comparison-shop.
Will these rules survive into 2026 given the political climate?
That's the honest uncertainty. Several provisions face legal challenges and a less regulation-friendly executive environment. Enforcement priorities have already shifted, so the rules exist on paper but their teeth vary considerably.
